Stats - Clan


logo CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
Unranked Members:
0/50
Leader: noBadge

noBadge
noBadge
Total Points: 473 164
Clan Location: Vietnam
Chat Language: -
Type: open
Required Trophies: 1.300 0
Required TH level: 1
War Frequency: always
Wars Won: 5
War Win Streak: 0
Capital Hall Level: 1
Open ingame
Clan description:
QUY ĐỊNH CỦA CLAN : 1 VÔ ĐÂY NHỚ GIỚI THIỆU VỀ MÌNH : 2 ONLINE VV KO XIN LÍNH RỒI OFF : 3 ĐÃ WAR KHÔNG ĐƯỢC BỎ WAR : 4 CLAN NGHIÊM CẤM CHỬI THỀ và nói tục ngày thành lập 2/7/2017

- League Level Name Troops donated Troops received Trophies
- Total Average per player
Troops donated: 0
Troops received: 0
Level: 0
Trophies: 0
Versus trophies: 0
2442 d ago +0 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
OK.happy
#CGL2JJUC
0 0% 5 vs 5 0 0%
2444 d ago +0 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
Denger Boys
#VQ2LQRV0
0 0% 5 vs 5 6 40%
2626 d ago +4 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
Zombie worrior
#RRQC8RPG
6 14.33% 15 vs 15 44 96.67%
2629 d ago +12 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
EMPIRE CLASH
#9YR28RYL
9 41.4% 10 vs 10 27 92.3%
2631 d ago +65 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
FANTOM
#QCQPYV8J
28 68.27% 15 vs 15 43 97.07%
2633 d ago +109 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
deViL cuZinz
#JC8UJUQV
23 88.1% 10 vs 10 0 0%
2635 d ago Friendly
CW
CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
TEAM PROTEIN
#CVR2U20Y
5 42.6% 5 vs 5 2 13.4%
2636 d ago +63 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
Mitra lok
#RQCLUG2Y
23 91.6% 10 vs 10 28 96%
2638 d ago +63 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
on terus
#QR20Q0U8
25 90.2% 10 vs 10 28 97.5%
2640 d ago +214 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
INDO TAMORA MDN
#JQPVVQLL
24 85.6% 10 vs 10 20 78.6%
2642 d ago +214 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
Avenger Force™
#JJ280L8L
25 88.2% 10 vs 10 11 41.2%
2644 d ago +110 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
黒豚の王子様
#CP9UQYL0
26 96.2% 10 vs 10 10 41.1%
2646 d ago +84 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
ملوك الحرب
#RUPGGP0L
25 67.93% 15 vs 15 19 48.47%
2648 d ago +50 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
خاکی هه ولیر
#JLRRG0JU
18 74.3% 10 vs 10 19 74.5%
2651 d ago +68 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
Last Stand
#J920G899
26 91.7% 10 vs 10 26 92.7%
2653 d ago +50 CLASH OF CLANS
#CPVJ8909
take u to sky
#LU9QY0RU
23 81.9% 10 vs 10 29 96.5%