Stats - Clan


logo RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
Unranked Members:
1/50
Total Points: 437 25
Clan Location: Vietnam
Chat Language: -
Type: inviteOnly
Required Trophies: 1.000 0
Required TH level: 1
War Frequency: unknown
Wars Won: 8
War Win Streak: 0
Capital Hall Level: 1
Open ingame
Clan description:
chao mug ae den voi clan doan ket vui ve dont ljh mac dinh lv4 con duoi thj dc mjen khoi dont nghjem cam bo war va tham an bonus aj khog tuan thu kick tat ca vj 1 clan vug manh lead xih gai Ngân Huỳnh tks

- League Level Name Troops donated Troops received Trophies
1. Silver League III 47 huynhtien1509
#P098G8J0G
Leader
0 0 0 0 875
50
- Total Average per player
Troops donated: 0 0
Troops received: 0 0
Level: 47 47
Trophies: 875 875
Versus trophies: 50 50
2767 d ago +52 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
GANGSTAR WAR
#YLUVPLQQ
21 79.4% 10 vs 10 26 89.2%
2772 d ago +113 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
DiZonAticsCLanz
#80UURQPP
29 97.7% 10 vs 10 28 94.8%
2774 d ago +124 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
fdp de bisca
#L2CV8P99
26 86.5% 10 vs 10 18 77.8%
2776 d ago +112 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
GCZ WARRIORS
#9P00Y0L
25 90.8% 10 vs 10 11 37.9%
2779 d ago +55 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
ЧУПА-ЧУПС
#JPPC9VVY
25 87.8% 10 vs 10 26 85.1%
2782 d ago +30 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
名人堂☆龍門客栈☆
#QPLL2Q8G
16 68.2% 10 vs 10 28 94.9%
3181 d ago +23 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
AE BÌNH LONG FC
#9CJCYQCJ
10 47.3% 10 vs 10 28 96%
3184 d ago +130 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
ララパルーザ
#LPQU8209
28 93.4% 10 vs 10 22 79.8%
3186 d ago +130 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
Die Löwen
#LQGJYR8V
29 95% 10 vs 10 7 33.5%
3188 d ago +49 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
deldadegan0111
#L9G2VY8L
18 50% 15 vs 15 36 83.27%
3191 d ago +150 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
james
#8QRCP8JR
37 90.53% 15 vs 15 35 82.13%
3193 d ago +115 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
DEDE bear
#9RG9VQCJ
19 73.3% 10 vs 10 19 66.5%
3195 d ago +130 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
Clash On Brown
#LJY8P0YQ
28 96.8% 10 vs 10 28 93.6%
3197 d ago +80 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
Razor Gang
#U2QJ00
25 88.6% 10 vs 10 27 92.9%
3200 d ago +80 RỒNG KIM LONG
#YUC29QJQ
3D MaX Clan
#Q2PP82G2
22 89.1% 10 vs 10 23 81.2%